Okay, thank you so much Elena for the kind introduction and thank you all in the audience
for making it back from holidays to attend my talk. So I'll be talking today about models of
agency in early China. But in difference to those of you who are not in Chinese studies,
I'd like to begin with a brief introduction to the historical and textual contexts of what we
call early China, of the early Chinese period. So early China begins roughly with the first
evidence of writing in the 13th century BC in a place called An Yan, which was the last
capital of the Shang kingdom. And this writing is in the form of oracle bone inscriptions,
such as the turtle plastron that you can see in the image. And these animal bones were used for
past romance, which is a plea for the gods to mediate in favor of human will. But the longer
texts that we study have an origin in the Warring States period. So from the 5th to the 3rd century
BC. And this is a time of civil war in which eight different states were fighting each other
constantly for hegemony, right, to control the territory. And so the Warring States period ended
when the state of Qin won the war and established the first unified empire, the Qin dynasty,
which gives way to our world for China. But the Qin dynasty wasn't long lived, it was quickly
overthrown by the much longer and influential Han dynasty, which goes on until the third century
of our era. And now I'd like to show you how the texts from this period looked like, written on
bamboo or silk. They were short compositions in the form of essays, narratives, dialogues,
aphorisms, old lists, points, and so on. And they were composed out of basic units, which have been
called building blocks by Bill Bolt. So these building blocks, they were movable and they could
be combined in different ways, making up for different texts. And then in the Han dynasty,
responding to the needs of the newly established imperial library, scholars felt the need, the
pressure to order, classify, and catalog the intellectual heritage from the past. So in a long
and complex process that involved addition, additions, deletions, interpolations, commentary,
interpretation, and even translation, our books from early China were born. So now why am I telling
you all this? I'm telling you this because when we think about, for example, the philosophy, the
Warring States philosophy of the Zhuanzi, right? We think about the Zhuanzi having an internal
coherence and consistency that is intended by the single book with a single author, right? But this
is quite misleading because the Zhuanzi, much as most of the other books from the early Chinese
period, are actually a Han dynasty compilation of heterogeneous materials, which were written by
different hands at different time periods. So this means that our early texts, our early books,
are composite. And the fact that they are composite texts has, of course, bearing on the way in which
we should deal with these texts, and in particular, the ways in which we should do Chinese, early
Chinese philosophy, which is my field. So I'll be happy to talk about my methodological approach
later on during the Q&A or maybe at any other time since I'm always there in my office. Now,
I'd like to tell you a little bit about my research in broad terms. So my research focuses
on patterns of arguments in early China in relation to the problem of human agency. And
these patterns are viewed as more or less successful responses to problems of uncertainty,
morality, efficacy, control, and freedom. So in other words, I deal with the problems of coping
with the future, decision-making, and how to act from the perspective of early Chinese philosophies.
And then I focus on what I call the model of adaptive agency as a privileged solution to these
problems. So what's adaptive agency? I think it's likely the first thing that the word adaptation
draws to your mind is Darwin and his theory of evolution. As you all know, Darwin postulated
evolution as a process through which organisms, physical and behavioral traits change over time,
becoming better fitted or adjusted to their habitat. So that's a process known as adaptation.
But in the 20th century, the concept of adaptation has been traveling back and forth between the
natural and the social sciences. And it's actually been applied to a multitude of fields,
from cultural ecology and climate change to business, military theory, and even informatics
and programming. Yet there is a fundamental difference between the concept of adaptation,
the biological concept of adaptation, and then the concept of adaptation in fields beyond the
natural sciences, the biological sciences. In biology, the way that Darwin postulated it,
Presenters
Dr. Mercedes M. Valmisa Oviedo
Zugänglich über
Offener Zugang
Dauer
00:45:26 Min
Aufnahmedatum
2018-01-09
Hochgeladen am
2018-03-13 09:12:17
Sprache
en-US